Study from Columbia University and WtERT Evaluates Performance of Six Mechanical-Biological Treatment (MBT) Facilities in Europe

Prof. Nickolas J. Themelis and Prof. A.C. (Thanos) Bourtsalas
Earth Engineering Center, Columbia University, 500 West 120th St., NY, NY 10027, USA

Journal: Waste Management 141 (2022) 79–91

Abstract

Professors A.C. Bourtsalas and N.J. Themelis of Columbia University present a comprehensive comparative study of six Mechanical-Biological Treatment (MBT) plants across Europe in their 2022 paper published in Waste Management. Link of the article in journal

Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT; called “dirty” Materials Recovery Facilities in the U.S.) is a waste management method, developed mostly in Europe, which combines sorting of recyclable materials (metals, paper, plastics, glass) with composting/digestion of green/ food wastes and, in some cases production of a fuel material. In 2018–19, the authors visited six MBT facilities in Europe that use different approaches for the recovery of materials and energy from mixed MSW. These plants were studied with respect to feedstock composition, operating conditions, capital expenditure, financial viability and environmental impacts. The compost product of most facilities examined did not comply with agricultural standards and, therefore, it was classified as compost-like output (CLO) and used as daily cover in landfills. The best composting practice used source separated organic materials (yard and other green wastes) and yielded a marketable compost. MBT plants that did not include the recovery of fuel materials had lower landfill diversion rates and, also, lower capital and operating costs. It was concluded that an MBT plant must include a very efficient sorting and recyclables recovery line and charge a sufficient gate fee. Also, in addition to the recycled products, there should be a stream to recover fuel materials sent to a power plant or cement plant, thus increasing revenue, and landfill diversion, and maximizing greenhouse gas (GHG) savings.

The study examines real-world plant performance in terms of:

  • Landfill diversion and material recovery

  • Compost and RDF quality

  • Greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions

  • Economic feasibility (CAPEX/OPEX)

Key insights reveal that:

  • High diversion rates and GHG savings depend on fuel recovery (e.g. RDF) and efficient sorting.

  • Source-separated organics are essential for producing compost suitable for agriculture.

  • Plants without fuel recovery have lower diversion rates but also lower investment and operating costs.

Acknowledgements:
The study was supported by the Earth Engineering Center of Columbia University. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the managers and engineers of the MBT plants examined, for facilitating plant visits and their assistance in the collection of the data.

read the full paper